Throttling Internet Makes Way for Profits?

Similarly, an Internet service provider can use bandwidth throttling to reduce the impact of specific services or applications, such as the BitTorrent protocol, and could also potentially use it to provide preferential bandwidth access to higher priority users at peak times.Bandwith Throttling

The Big Internet controllers want you to now believe that it is now called, Usage Based Billing? What do you believe? Do you like watching Television over the internet. If the big controllers cannot "control this" then they will loose control of satellites and TV stations, which serve to meter articles, shows,  and advertising to your home.



So what exactly do you know about internet throttling? Have a look and orientate your mind about what was "free access to freedom of information" has been given credibility by Clement's rulings of the CRTC over the issues of "who shall own the internet." How they will now force you to pay "more" for what you use. Do you know why? That internet is a resource and value to Canadian people.

Throttling is a crime?

Analysis: The White Lies ISPs Tell About Broadband Speeds

By Art Reisman, CTO, APconnections (www.netequalzer.com)

In a recent PC Magazine article, writer Jeremy Kaplan did a fantastic job of exposing the true Internet access speeds of the large consumer providers.

He did this by creating a speed test that measured the throughput of continuous access to popular Web sites like Google, Expedia, and many others. Until this report was published, the common metric for comparing ISPs was through the use of the numerous Internet speed test sites available online.

The problem with this validation method was that it could not simulate real speeds encountered when doing typical Web surfing and downloading operations. Plus, ISPs can tamper with the results of speed tests — more on this later.

When I saw the results of PC Magazine’s testing, I was a bit relieved to see that the actual speeds of large providers was somewhere between 150 Kbit/s and 200 Kbit/s. This is a far cry from the two, three or even four megabit download speeds frequently hyped in ISP marketing literature.

***

Please don"t not mind the rant.

One can get very tired of the comparisons that a Liberal Party in BC touts as to validation processes to the principals of their health care schemes and the for profit schemes  that other countries have. Those schemes  that will make it better for the average citizen?

But over and over again,  we understand the depleting results of governmental control and interference has over Canadian choice, and how much money you have. Defers you to a "pricing system that was once controlled by the public," has now been deferred,  as it had been from public control over it's resources. "Charging very little" when it comes to companies who steal those resources and gives back very little to the welfare of the citizens of this country called Canada.

That resource management would account for a large portion of the advances in society in terms of what we want this country called Canada to be in terms of the Citizenry's access to proper Health Care and not "for profit schemes" as well as,  to the advancement of the culture based on "freedom of access to knowledge and information" that would raise the knowledge base of the inhabitants of this place we call Canada.

The Liberals and Progressives are giving away all that we have left in our pockets and wondering why our economy is stagnate. It is because these "for profits schemes" has just about depleted the average incomes of the society.  In which,  such companies seek to propel it's advantages toward "monopolizing control over the costs and direction of consumerism?"

These governments call that a free market? Free for whom,  to monopolize and secure "a percentage based money accrual from companies who at a whim can raised the price and seek to ensure governmental taxes also increase the coffers of the proposals of that free market system, by election of principals of democracy by which those Governments stand?

***

Today Finland officially becomes first nation to make broadband a legal right

Starting today (July 1), every Finnish citizen now has a guaranteed legal right to a least a 1Mbps broadband connection, putting it on the same footing as other legal rights in the country such as healthcare and education.

As we reported last year, Finland was the first nation in the world to pass this type of legislation, followed by Spain in November.

The Finish government has promised guaranteed speeds of 100Mbps by 2015 for all of its citizens, and currently about 97% of Finns already have access to broadband connections.

As our @Zee mentioned last year: “the fast growth of technology has led the European Commission to bring forward a review of the basic telecoms services Europeans can expect.”Today Finland officially becomes first nation to make broadband a legal right

Falcon and the Liberals if your so good at comparisons that support and use media in order to drive this message home, then why not stand up Provincially for what must occur nationally, as you so think of the HST? What is good for us.

Why cut rural schools out and having destroy those communities, when those school centers can become the advancement of knowledge beyond the curriculum of the school standard, and reward systems of singling out  teachers for better individual pay? The teachers are the custodians of our school and are the providers and guardians of the knowledge within those rural schools? Those rural communities, do they have access to the high speed internet?

Google

Finally, I want to applaud and thank FCC Chairman Kevin Martin, the other commissioners, and the FCC Office of Engineering and Technology for their leadership in advancing this important issue. And, thanks to the more than 20,000 of you who took a stand on this issue through our Free the Airwaves campaign, the FCC heard a clear message from consumers: these airwaves can bring wireless Internet to everyone everywhere.A vote for broadband in the "white spaces"Posted by Larry Page, Co-Founder and President of Products Wednesday, November 5, 2008

Time to make your move if you really care about that access to information. You can see how advertising makes money, so we know where the benefits comes from, from allowing more people toward Google searches? If you can do that with your "telephone services" then why not by providing "access to the internet?" Who owns the internet to buy?